In an address at Montclair State College (N.J.) on May 29, the president and publisher of The New York Times remarked that 'there is nothing wrong with anyone speaking out vigorously when they [sic] think our facts are wrong or our opinions wrongheaded.' But where, Mr. Sulzberger, can he, or they, speak out? For the Times is virtually without competition. Nor is it noted for its hospitality to those who 'think [its] facts are wrong.' Mr. Sulzberger went on to defend our 'unfettered press' to the extent of rejecting 'various proposals within the journalistic community' that 'press councils' 'monitor' and 'correct' its 'performance.' But why? Should the press be above correction when in error? Does the correcting of the press's facts necessarily 'fetter' it?
Feature, 1949 words
To read the full text of this piece, please choose one of the following options:
|
If you are already a subscriber to the Review's electronic edition, please sign in: |
To subscribe to the electronic edition, please press the button below. |
To purchase access to this article for $3, please press the button below. |