Walker & Co, 403 pp., $12.50
East Asian Series, Harvard, 225 pp., $8.50
Oxford, 830 pp., $14.50
Random House, 322 pp., $1.95 (paper)
Random House, 394 pp., $1.95 (paper)
Random House, 667 pp., $2.45 (paper)
Cornell, 296 pp., $8.50
Crosscurrents in World History Series, Dial, 272 pp., $7.95
Arts of Mankind Series, Braziller, 450, 451 illustrations with 91 color plates pp., $30.00
One of the most astonishing facts about the history of China is the immense length of time that elapsed before it became the disinterested study of Western intellectuals—and even now Sinologists are only beginning to grope with some of the fundamental questions posed by the immensity of China's past. At first sight this seems in marked contrast to Rome on whose history myriads of scholars have swarmed like ants these last 400 years; editing, translating, collecting, commenting on everything from the text of Livy to a denarius unearthed in Kirkcudbrightshire. And yet some of the most fundamental problems, particularly those which relate to the consequences of Rome's decline and fall, have not made much progress since the days of Edward Gibbon. But what is perhaps more surprising still, in these days of comparative history, hardly a scholar has ventured to compare these two great Iron Age empires, Rome and China; the two most formidable, most accomplished, most sophisticated that the pre-industrial world was to know.
Review, 2922 words
To read the full text of this piece, please choose one of the following options:
|
If you are already a subscriber to the Review's electronic edition, please sign in: |
To subscribe to the electronic edition, please press the button below. |
To purchase access to this article for $3, please press the button below. |