Hill and Wang, 112 pp., $1.25
National Press, 145 pp., $2.95
Grossman, 205 pp., $5.00
National Lawyers Guild, 140 pp., $10.00
Grove, n.p., $0.75
Monthly Review and Grove Press, 130 pp., $1.25
Penguin, 197 pp., $1.25
National Lawyers Guild, 53 pp., $1.00
House of Anansi (Toronto), 128 pp., $1.00
University of Chicago, 497 pp., $12.95
During the last few years critics have been calling for reforms of the draft or for its end, some suggesting in its place either a volunteer army or a system of national service. The Marshall Commission Report, [1] for example, proposed ending college deferments and calling men by lottery, rather than through the idiosyncratic decisions of some 4,000 local draft boards. In the current political campaign, each candidate has had at least to acknowledge the widespread hostility to the draft by proposing major revisions (as Rockefeller did when he called for a lottery) or its eventual elimination (as Nixon and Kennedy have done—to begin after the war, to be sure). But the draft has continued, substantially unaltered, largely because it permits the President to wage war by administrative decree.
Review, 7450 words
To read the full text of this piece, please choose one of the following options:
|
If you are already a subscriber to the Review's electronic edition, please sign in: |
To subscribe to the electronic edition, please press the button below. |
To purchase access to this article for $3, please press the button below. |