Indiana University, 266 pp., $6.95
Harvard, 428 pp., $7.95
Fairness requires a historian to resist easy judgments after the fact. Yet his eagerness to avoid the temptation to condemn the past by 'hindsight' may only deliver him into a form of neutrality in which he excuses everything on the grounds that our predecessors were too benighted to be expected to arrive at the truth; they must be judged 'by the standards of their own day.' What looks at first like historical 'objectivity' reveals itself as a particularly insidious kind of condescension, compared to which even 'hindsight' begins to seem preferable.
Review, 3108 words
To read the full text of this piece, please choose one of the following options:
|
If you are already a subscriber to the Review's electronic edition, please sign in: |
To subscribe to the electronic edition, please press the button below. |
To purchase access to this article for $3, please press the button below. |