BOOKS DISCUSSED IN THIS ARTICLE
HarperCollins, 234 pp., $25.95
Bantam, 243 pp., $25.00
Norton, 567 pp., $10.00
Brassey's, 307 pp., $27.50
Free Press, 304 pp., $27.00
a three-part television series
BBC Two, October 20 and 27 and November 3, 2004
I.B. Tauris, 292 pp., $24.95
In his November 3 victory speech, President Bush, sounding the keynote of his second administration, pledged to 'fight this war on terror with every resource of our national power.' By saying 'this' rather than 'the' Bush stressed the palpable, near-at-hand quality of the war whose symbols have grown to surround us in the last three years—the tilted barrels of security cameras, BioWatch pathogen-sniffers, and all the rest of the technology of security and surveillance that Matthew Brzezinski somewhat overexcitedly details in Fortress America. Voters, at least, have been impressed. Responding to the exit pollers' question 'Which ONE issue mattered most in deciding how you voted for president?' 32 percent of Bush supporters named 'Terrorism' (as against 5 percent of Kerry supporters), 85 percent of Bush supporters said that the country was 'safer from terrorism' in 2004 than it was in 2000, and 79 percent said that the war in Iraq 'has improved the long-term security of the United States.' Bush's successful conflation of security at home and military aggression abroad, his insistence that Iraq 'is the central front of the war on terror,' was the bravura rhetorical gambit that drove much of his electoral strategy.
Review, 6199 words
To read the full text of this piece, please choose one of the following options:
|
If you are already a subscriber to the Review's electronic edition, please sign in: |
To subscribe to the electronic edition, please press the button below. |
To purchase access to this article for $3, please press the button below. |