Government Printing Office, 572 pp., three volumes, $60.00 (paper)
Government Printing Office, 785 pp., three volumes, $60.00 (paper)
Government Printing Office, 1,150 pp., three volumes, $60.00 (paper)
Times Books, 592 pp., $15.00 (paper)
The confusion with which Lawrence E. Walsh's final Iran-contra report was received was strikingly reflected in The New York Times of January 19, 1994. A news report by David Johnston emphasized that the report 'presented few fresh facts,' and that Walsh had 'persevered on a trail that seemed to be growing cold.' A news analysis by David E. Rosenbaum said that the report 'added nothing but small details to what was already known about the case.' An editorial was somewhat warmer—the report vindicates 'the law's requirement for a full report of his investigation.' On the op-ed page, Peter Kornbluh and Malcolm Byrne of the National Security Archive in Washington were much the warmest: the report 'set the record straight on the major players in the scandal.' Thus the Times provided its readers with two negative news reports, one moderate editorial, and one totally uncritical op-ed piece.
Review, 5711 words
To read the full text of this piece, please choose one of the following options:
|
If you are already a subscriber to the Review's electronic edition, please sign in: |
To subscribe to the electronic edition, please press the button below. |
To purchase access to this article for $3, please press the button below. |