Volume 35, Number 4 · March 17, 1988

Bumps on the Head

By Martin Gardner
Pseudo-Science and Society in Nineteenth-Century America
edited by Arthur Wrobel

University Press of Kentucky, 245 pp., $24.00

How can good science be distinguished from bad? Philosophers of science call this the 'demarcation problem.' Like most problems about distinguishing parts of spectra, sharp definitions are impossible, but from hazy borders it doesn't follow that distinctions between extremes are useless. Twilight doesn't invalidate the contrast between day and night. The fact that top scientists disagree about many things doesn't mean that terms like pseudoscience, crank, and charlatan have no place in the history of science.



Review, 3188 words

To read the full text of this piece, please choose one of the following options:

If you are already a subscriber to the Review's electronic edition, please sign in:

To subscribe to the electronic edition, please press the button below.

I agree to the terms and conditions for this service.

To purchase access to this article for $3, please press the button below.

I agree to the terms and conditions for this service.


Search the Review
Advanced search