University of Chicago Press, 451 pp., $32.50
Harvard University Press, 397 pp., $24.95 (paper)
It is now thirty years since, in Penser la Révolution française,[1] the late François Furet offered a revisionist explanation of the French Revolution; but, if I am not mistaken, it is still the reigning orthodoxy. Which it well deserves to be. For it is simple but profound and is, before anything else, a theory not so much about the Revolution as about what a historian should be doing when writing about that infinitely significant event. His duty, above all else, Furet argues, is to keep his distance: to cling, as a working assumption, to the old adage that 'men make history but do not know the history they are making.' For the historians have, for very understandable human reasons, come to treat 1789 as a sort of 'zero' date, presenting it in their books and syllabuses as the key to what, historically speaking, lies both upstream and downstream.
Review, 5477 words
To read the full text of this piece, please choose one of the following options:
|
If you are already a subscriber to the Review's electronic edition, please sign in: |
To subscribe to the electronic edition, please press the button below. |
To purchase access to this article for $3, please press the button below. |