Volume 30, Number 16 · October 27, 1983

The Return of Virgil

By D.S. Carne-Ross
The Aeneid
by Virgil, translated by Robert Fitzgerald

Random House, 402 pp., $20.00

A great poem? Yes, of course, but not in the very front rank, not quite in the same class as the Iliad and The Divine Comedy. So, I think, the common judgment on the Aeneid now runs. Eliot struck the note when, contrasting Tennyson's 'Ulysses' with the twenty-sixth canto of the Inferno, he described the 'Tennyson-Virgilianism' of the diction as 'too poetical in comparison with Dante to be the highest poetry.' If Virgil has not, like Milton in the Thirties, been 'dethroned,' it is because, a few cantankerous poets apart (Pound, Graves), those who go in for such demolition work have not cared enough one way or the other. Let the Mantuan gather dust in his niche. What harm is he doing?



Review, 3239 words

To read the full text of this piece, please choose one of the following options:

If you are already a subscriber to the Review's electronic edition, please sign in:

To subscribe to the electronic edition, please press the button below.

I agree to the terms and conditions for this service.

To purchase access to this article for $3, please press the button below.

I agree to the terms and conditions for this service.


Search the Review
Advanced search