Pantheon, 176 pp., $3.95 (paper)
W.H. Freeman, 239 pp., $9.95 (paper)
University of New Mexico Press, 238 pp., $21.95
Pantheon, 280 pp., $13.95
Columbia University Press, 197 pp., $16.95
Pantheon, 251 pp., $6.95 (paper)
MIT Press, 213 pp., $15.00
Addison-Wesley, 356 pp., $12.50 (paper)
Scientists are infatuated with the idea of revolution. Even before the publication of Thomas Kuhn's The Structure of Scientific Revolutions,[1] and with ever increasing frequency after it, would-be Lenins of the laboratory have daydreamed about overthrowing the state of their science and establishing a new intellectual order. After all, who, in a social community that places so high a value on originality, wants to be thought of as a mere epigone, carrying out 'normal science' in pursuit of a conventional 'paradigm'? Those very terms, introduced by Kuhn, reek of dullness and conventionality. Better, as J.B.S. Haldane used to say, to produce something that is 'interesting, even if not true.' As a characterized, new discoveries are characterized as 'revolutions' even when they only confirm and extend the power of ideas that already rule.
Review, 6266 words
To read the full text of this piece, please choose one of the following options:
|
If you are already a subscriber to the Review's electronic edition, please sign in: |
To subscribe to the electronic edition, please press the button below. |
To purchase access to this article for $3, please press the button below. |