Yale University Press, 384 pp., #35.00
OTHER BOOKS DRAWN ON IN THIS ESSAY:
Zoland Books, 288 pp., $10.95 (paper)
Abrams, 320 pp., $75
Tibor de Nagy Editions/The Promise of Learnings, Inc., 90 pp., $20.00 (paper)
Braziller, 127 pp., (out of print)
Fairfield Porter was one of the most intensely ethical painters in the annals of American art, so he might wonder about the claims that have been made for him in the years since his death. Justin Spring's biography is now the second major study of the painter that fudges the significance of a figure whose standing was ambiguous already for most of his career. Spring begins and ends his account by quoting John Ashbery's estimation that Porter is 'perhaps the major American artist of this century.' John T. Spike, in turn, in his profusely illustrated 1992 account of Porter's art and life, used as his shield, as it were, Hilton Kramer's belief that Porter is 'an American classic.' Both of Porter's biographers imply that they understand that the high claims of Ashbery and Kramer (and a few others) aren't universally held; but neither stops to examine, really, what is now a growing chasm between this artist's admirers and those for whom he's barely on the chart. Neither acknowledges that Porter, who was also a serious and shrewd critic, came far closer to the reality of the situation when he wrote in his last years, 'I think sometimes that as far as museums and patrons are concerned that I may be 'finished,' that is, that it has been decided that my work is not really any good.'
Review, 4432 words
To read the full text of this piece, please choose one of the following options:
|
If you are already a subscriber to the Review's electronic edition, please sign in: |
To subscribe to the electronic edition, please press the button below. |
To purchase access to this article for $3, please press the button below. |