P.O. Box 69, Oxford, England, $7.50 single issue
It has been cruelly said that the English have a sense of themselves as a nation, but not as a people. The French or Spanish democrat can point to cataclysms and caesurae in history which have allowed 'the people' to define itself and to establish its own tradition and mythology distinct from those of the ruling groups. England has had no such experiences since the well-expunged seventeenth-century revolution, and is still supposed to have a single 'history.' Whatever their differences over priorities and interpretations, the liberal historians who have dominated British history have never allowed that the working class might be entitled to see the past as a story with quite different leaders and struggles and tragedies. This has disturbed younger and more radical historians for most of the postwar period, and they have begun—like intellectual nationalists cooking up a culture for a suppressed linguistic group—to compose that missing tradition on their own.
Review, 724 words
To read the full text of this piece, please choose one of the following options:
|
If you are already a subscriber to the Review's electronic edition, please sign in: |
To subscribe to the electronic edition, please press the button below. |
To purchase access to this article for $3, please press the button below. |