Economists, preoccupied with theories of the corporation and the national economy, rarely ask what happens when a corporation monopolizes not only a product but the local work force, when a town is obliged to 'consume' a company's pollution, when one business controls a city by political intimidation. While such questions are largely ignored, local families and local owners increasingly become appendages of the absentee-owners, usually of national and multinational conglomerates. 'He who was a leader in the village becomes dependent on outsiders for his action and policy,' Justice William O. Douglas said of this condition. 'Clerks responsible to a superior in a distant place take the place of resident proprietors beholden to no one.'[1]
Feature, 4284 words
To read the full text of this piece, please choose one of the following options:
|
If you are already a subscriber to the Review's electronic edition, please sign in: |
To subscribe to the electronic edition, please press the button below. |
To purchase access to this article for $3, please press the button below. |