Harper & Row, 210 pp., $6.50
Professor Bickel's book has had more attention than most books by law professors—even when they write about the Supreme Court. I was not in the United States when the book was published, but I saw several newspaper columns and a rather long article in Time magazine about the book, all of them claiming that it was a thorough-going and harsh criticism of the Warren Court. Bickel's view that the Court's most famous decision, Brown vs. Board of Education, is 'irrelevant' and obsolete was regarded as especially news-worthy. The dust jacket, moreover, tells us that the book accuses the Court of 'irrationality, inconsistency, and, at times, incoherence; of overconfidence in itself and in the rule of the majority; and of unwise decisions which lead to undue centralization of government.'
Review, 3937 words
To read the full text of this piece, please choose one of the following options:
|
If you are already a subscriber to the Review's electronic edition, please sign in: |
To subscribe to the electronic edition, please press the button below. |
To purchase access to this article for $3, please press the button below. |