Cambridge, 214 pp., $4.75
Cambridge, 161 pp., $5.00
Toronto, 784, (2 vols.) pp., $20.00
Among the epigraphs prefacing The Nature and Limits of Political Science is Cardinal Newman's famous definition of liberalism: 'By liberalism I mean the exercise of thought upon matter, in which from the constitution of the human mind, thought cannot be brought to any successful issue and is therefore out of place.' Maurice Cowling, in his extremely contentious book, convicts political science, as well as contemporary politics, of this liberal heresy. The proper mode of political science, he insists, is contemplative rather than practical, metaphysical rather than ethical; but the prevailing mode he finds to be practical and ethical. Political scientists have been unable to resist the illicit 'exercise of thought,' the illusion that what they have to say matters in the world of affairs.
Review, 2291 words
To read the full text of this piece, please choose one of the following options:
|
If you are already a subscriber to the Review's electronic edition, please sign in: |
To subscribe to the electronic edition, please press the button below. |
To purchase access to this article for $3, please press the button below. |