Volume 38, Number 16 · October 10, 1991

When It's Rational to be Irrational

By Alan Ryan
The Cement of Society: A Study of Social Order
by Jon Elster

Cambridge University Press, 311 pp., $16.95 (paper)

Nuts and Bolts for the Social Sciences
by Jon Elster

Cambridge University Press, 184 pp., $10.95 (paper)

Solomonic Judgments: Studies in the Limitations of Rationality
by Jon Elster

Cambridge University Press, 232 pp., $13.95 (paper)

We know, according to Pascal, that the heart has its reasons that reason knows nothing about. Poets have sided with the theologians, agreeing that God speaks to the humble heart, and not to the arrogant intellect. Lately, the intellectuals have been stealing their critics' clothing. Economists, philosophers, logicians, and theorists of 'rational choice'—of whom Jon Elster is one of the most prominent—have begun to tell us that it is more rational to be irrational than rational. Their grounds are hardly traditional ones. It is not the voice of God but the calculations of reason that tell us not to listen to reason. It is not a high-minded alternative to economic reasoning but economic reasoning itself that tells persons who want to 'maximize their utilities' that they will succeed only if they do not try.[1]



Review, 4947 words

To read the full text of this piece, please choose one of the following options:

If you are already a subscriber to the Review's electronic edition, please sign in:

To subscribe to the electronic edition, please press the button below.

I agree to the terms and conditions for this service.

To purchase access to this article for $3, please press the button below.

I agree to the terms and conditions for this service.


Search the Review
Advanced search