Oxford University Press, 360 pp., $28.75
Pierpont Morgan Library, 210 pp., $8.00 (paper)
Princeton University Press, 312 pp., $17.50
George Braziller, 120 pp., $9.95 (paper)
Colnaghi Gallery (London), 160 pp., £12.50 (paper)
The American Federation of Arts, 191 pp., $8.00 (paper)
University of Chicago Press, 352 pp., $150
North Holland (Amsterdam), 411 pp., $63.25
The Mughal empire in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries was splendid, the richest empire of its time, sucking in even the gold of Spanish America; and Mughal art had its admirers from the start. At the von Hirsch sale in London last year there was Rembrandt's copy of, or variation on, a Mughal portrait of Shah Jahan, the painter's contemporary (the turbaned head more European, less royal, the legs less pneumatic and formal). A modest tribute; but, until the work of the contemporary British painter Howard Hodgkin, no tribute like it was paid to the related art of the Hindu, Rajput principalities within the Mughal empire, particularly the miniature paintings of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. Their Hindu motifs were too mysterious or simple; their flat patches of symbolic color—the world observed only to be reduced to pattern, the physical world more felt than contemplated—answered no European idea of high art until this century. This private art sank with the courts that produced it, and was forgotten.
Review, 5746 words
To read the full text of this piece, please choose one of the following options:
|
If you are already a subscriber to the Review's electronic edition, please sign in: |
To subscribe to the electronic edition, please press the button below. |
To purchase access to this article for $3, please press the button below. |