In response to:
Neuroscience and the Law: Don’t Rush In from the May 12, 2016 issue
To the Editors:
In his very timely essay “Neuroscience and the Law: Don’t Rush In” [NYR, May 12], Judge Jed S. Rakoff states that “most nations banned lobotomies altogether; but they are still legal in the US in limited circumstances.” I am not aware that this procedure is still practiced anywhere in the world. It has been replaced by various modalities of “deep brain stimulation” (DBS), a much less invasive treatment, which interrupts temporarily and in a reversible way nervous circuits that were found to be impaired in many neurological and psychiatric conditions. The field of “functional neurosurgery” is blooming due to better understanding of the function of the neural systems, more precise image techniques, and better definitions of the appropriate targets. One should also add that parallel to the development of the field of “Neurolaw,” “Neuroethics” has become a most relevant area in bioethics.
J. Lobo Antunes
University of Lisbon
Jed S. Rakoff replies:
Although lobotomies remain legal in the US, Dr. Antunes is correct that they are no longer performed here in the crude “ice-pick” way they were performed in the mid-twentieth century. But they still exist, in modified and more sophisticated form, in controversial procedures called “lobectomies,” which disconnect the two hemispheres of the brain to treat epilepsy, and “limbic leukotomies,” which disconnect certain brain pathways to treat obsessive-compulsive disorder. In many such cases, “personality changes” have been reported after surgery.