Habermas’s Reformation

The Idea of a Critical Theory: Habermas and the Frankfurt School

by Raymond Geuss
Cambridge University Press, 100 pp., $19.95; $6.95 (paper)

Knowledge and Human Interests

by Jürgen Habermas, translated by Jeremy Shapiro
Beacon, 356 pp., $5.95 (paper)

Toward a Rational Society: Student Protest, Science, and Politics

by Jürgen Habermas, translated by Jeremy Shapiro
Beacon, 132 pp., $3.95 (paper)

Theory and Practice

by Jürgen Habermas, translated by John Viertel
Beacon, 310 pp., $4.95 (paper)

Legitimation Crisis

by Jürgen Habermas, translated by Thomas McCarthy
Beacon, 166 pp., $6.25 (paper)

Communication and the Evolution of Society

by Jürgen Habermas, translated by Thomas McCarthy
Beacon, 239 pp., $6.95 (paper)

Theorie der Gesellschaft oder Sozialtechnologie

by Jürgen Habermas, by Niklas Luhmann
Suhrkamp, Frankfurt, 404 pp., $13.00 (paper)

The Critical Theory of Jürgen Habermas

by Thomas McCarthy
MIT Press, 484 pp., $25.00; $12.50 (paper)

Habermas: Critical Debates

edited by John B. Thompson, edited by David Held
MIT Press, 324 pp., $30.00; $12.50 (paper)

Among the ever-increasing volume of studies devoted to the social philosophy of Jürgen Habermas and other members of the Frankfurt school, Professor Raymond Geuss’s recent book, The Idea of A Critical Theory, stands out as a contribution of exceptional originality and interest. It is searching in its criticisms, but never loses its basic sympathy. It is formidably dense in texture, but unfailingly lucid in its presentation of Habermas’s often obscure arguments. It is remarkably concise, but is clearly based on a comprehensive study of all the relevant literature. As such it offers an excellent starting point for a reconsideration of Habermas’s “critical theory” as a whole. What sort of a theory is Habermas seeking to construct, and what should we think of it?

Although Habermas has lately been engaged on a large-scale restatement of his ideas, there are ample materials already available in English for forming at least a preliminary assessment of his work. The general structure of his theory was originally outlined in the two treatises he published in the late 1960s, translated as Theory and Practice and Knowledge and Human Interests. These were followed by a series of essays collected in Toward a Rational Society, in which Habermas sketched some of the political implications of his position, and then by Legitimation Crisis, a more formal analysis of the problems facing the advanced capitalist societies. Finally, Habermas’s recent preoccupation with technical issues in the philosophy of language can be traced in Communication and the Evolution of Society, a further set of essays that also reflects the other main theme of his latest research, the historical study of the formation and development of ideologies.

Like other theorists of the Frankfurt School—notably Herbert Marcuse—Habermas starts out from the observation that in modern industrialized societies we are all living an unfree, “one-dimensional” form of social existence. Our experience of repression, he repeatedly claims in Knowledge and Human Interests, gives rise to “unequivocally identifiable suffering,” and this in turn furnishes us with both the occasion and the justification for trying to develop a “critical” and “reflective” type of social science.

So far this is very familiar territory. Ever since Rousseau declared on the opening page of The Social Contract that “man is born free, yet everywhere he is in chains,” social theorists of all persuasions have bewailed the tendency of modern mass society to frustrate our natural and creative impulses. Marx in his earliest writings placed his main emphasis on the power of capitalism to alienate us from our work and its products, from our true natures and the rest of human kind. Tocqueville and John Stuart Mill alike insisted that, with the advance of democratic government, there has been a corresponding erosion of individual freedom and spontaneity. And Max Weber spoke with even greater eloquence—recently echoed by Michel Foucault and his disciples—of the “iron cage” in which we have all become imprisoned by the demands of a technological and bureaucratically organized way of …

This article is available to Online Edition and Print Premium subscribers only.
Please choose from one of the options below to access this article:
If you already have one of these subscriptions, please be sure you are logged in to your nybooks.com account. If you subscribe to the print edition, you may also need to link your web site account to your print subscription. Click here to link your account services.
Letters

Defending Habermas January 20, 1983