Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project
On June 21, in one of its last decisions of the term, Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project, the Supreme Court ruled that the First Amendment permits Congress to imprison human rights activists merely for advising militant organizations on ways to reject violence and pursue their disputes through lawful means. The Court’s decision is all the more disturbing when contrasted with its ruling in the Citizens United case earlier this year. In the Roberts Court’s world, corporations’ freedom to spend unlimited sums of money apparently deserves substantially greater protection than the freedom of human rights advocates to speak.
This article is available to subscribers only.
Please choose from one of the options below to access this article:
Purchase a print subscription (20 issues per year) and also receive online access to all articles published within the last five years.
Purchase an Online Edition subscription and receive full access to all articles published by the Review since 1963.
Purchase a trial Online Edition subscription and receive unlimited access for one week to all the content on nybooks.com.