Dickens’s two daughters, like many of his sons, lived all their lives in his shadow. Mamie wrote a book, My Father as I Recall Him, which was published after her death, and a biography of him for younger readers. Once her father died, she lived with her aunt. Together they worked on a three-volume edition of Charles Dickens’s letters. While Mamie saw her mother—who outlived her father by nine years—relations were merely polite and formal, not as close indeed as her relations with Ellen Ternan, whom she continued to see after her father’s death. Mamie revered her father’s memory. “My love for my father,” she wrote, “has never been touched or approached by any other love. I hold him in my heart of hearts as a man apart from all other men, as one apart from all other beings.”
Her sister Kate, who was her father’s favorite daughter, married twice and became an artist specializing in portraits of children. She was a friend of George Bernard Shaw, G.K. Chesterton, and Henry James. Since she was in possession of her mother’s letters to her father (which her mother wanted preserved so the world would know that Dickens had once loved her), she read James’s The Aspern Papers with considerable interest. She, too, was involved in furthering her father’s fame and taking care of his memory. In the early years of the twentieth century—she died in 1929 at the age of ninety—“she became involved,” as Gottlieb writes, “with the doings of the Dickens Fellowship, attending (and dominating) its meetings as long as she was able to go out.” She wrote to George Bernard Shaw about her father’s reputation: “If you could make the public understand that my father was not a joyous, jocund gentleman walking around the world with a plum pudding and a bowl of punch, you would greatly oblige me.”
Dickens decided that Walter, his second son, was not clever enough for Eton and instead would be destined for a life in the East India Company, for which he began to prepare him at the age of ten. Walter sailed for India at the age of sixteen. While the lives of his two sisters could have been charted with ease and wry familiarity by Henry James, and the life of his older brother could have been dramatized by Trollope or George Eliot, the life of Walter belongs more in a novel by J.G. Farrell. On arrival in India, he was involved in the relief of the siege of Lucknow. He suffered “sun-stroke, a passing-attack of small pox, and smart Fever,” according to a letter his father wrote. He also got in debt. His father, having bailed him out once, made clear that he would not do so again.
Walter, in the meantime, had become increasingly ill. He wrote to his sister that he was “so weak that he could hardly crawl”; he was planning to come home on sick leave when he died suddenly in Calcutta at the age of twenty-two. As news came of his death, so too there was evidence of the way in which associates of his parents viewed their separation. Sir William Hardman, for example, editor of the Morning Post, wrote in a letter:
Poor Mrs. Charles Dickens is in great grief at the loss of the second son…. Her grief is much enhanced by the fact that her husband has not taken any notice of the event to her, either by letter or otherwise. If anything were wanting to sink Charles Dickens to the lowest depths of my esteem, this fills up the measure of his iniquity. As a writer, I admire him; as a man, I despise him.
The next son was Frank. He was sent to join the Bengal Mounted Police not long after Walter had died in India but before the news reached England. He was, his father wrote, “a good steady fellow, but not at all brilliant.” Like Walter and indeed Charley, he was not skilled at handling money and was always in debt. He went eventually to Canada where he was a member of North West Mounted Police. He was involved in 1885 in the forced retreat, under the most harrowing circumstances, of the Mounties from Fort Pitt, where they were under siege by the natives. Soon afterward, he had the idea of giving public lectures about his life as a Mountie and giving readings from his father’s work. He died suddenly at the age of forty-two.
Three more sons—Alfred, Sydney, and Plorn—were also sent away young, two to Australia. Dickens as an editor and novelist was interested in Australia. Squeers in Nicholas Nickleby was transported there. Dickens had the Micawbers emigrate there at the end of David Copperfield. Magwitch, who was transported to New South Wales in Great Expectations, was allowed make his fortune there. So, too, Alfred and Plorn Dickens were sent by their father to seek their fortunes in Australia. Alfred worked in sheep-farming, and after some prosperous years, as the economy began to collapse, he realized that he could make more money talking about his father. He was drinking, and like many of his siblings was useless with money.
He began giving public lectures on Dickens, punctuated with readings. At the age of sixty-five, after an absence of forty-five years, he came back to England where he followed his father’s footsteps in tireless public performances. He soon went to America for more of the same. His performances were immensely popular in America. When he was asked if it did not make him sad standing in the same places as his father had stood, he replied: “Why should it?… I never forget my father for a moment. I feel he is always with me, you know.” Alfred died suddenly in New York in 1912.
His brother Plorn seems to have been their father’s favorite son. Dickens wrote a friend that “there cannot possibly be another baby anywhere, to come into competition with him. I happen to know this, and would like it to be generally understood.” Mamie remembered her father and his youngest child as constant companions, but by the time Plorn was fifteen, the watchfulness and deep suspicion that Dickens displayed in relation to his other sons emerged, and he noted Plorn’s “want of application,” which he traced to his mother, whom Dickens, as Gottlieb writes, “criticized privately and publicly for her lethargy and indolence.”
Dickens began to believe that a life overseas would be best for Plorn. Gottlieb mentions an “ambiguous letter” from Catherine to her sister protesting this decision and adds, “but of course she had no legal right to interfere with it.”
It was decided to send him to Australia to join his brother. He was sixteen. One of his other siblings reported on the parting between father and son: “I never saw a man so completely overcome, giving way, as [my father] did, to extreme sorrow, quite unconscious of his surroundings on the platform.” In a letter Dickens wrote to Plorn to take with him he reminded him of his own hard childhood and his own determination to succeed: “I was not so old as you are now, when I first had to win my food, and to do it out of this determination and I have never slackened in it since.” He concluded: “I hope you will always be able to say in after life, that you had a kind father.”
While Dickens’s treatment of his wife could only be rendered by Thomas Hardy at his most extreme, or one of the Brontës, or a Gothic novelist, it is too easy to make judgments about Dickens’s treatment of his sons. It has to be remembered that the sending of children to the colonies, or to the army or into the navy, at a very young age was part of the norm in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. Two of Jane Austen’s brothers, for example, joined the navy at twelve, without losing a central place in the affections of the family. Austen would dramatize in Mansfield Park the close connection between Fanny Price and her brother William, who joined the navy at twelve.
Dickens’s son Sydney joined the navy at fourteen. He too became a reckless spender. To a friend, Dickens wrote complaining of his sons’ spendthrift habits: “I can’t get my hat on; in consequence of the extent to which my hair stands on end at the costs and charges of these boys. Why was I ever a father! Why was my father ever a father!” Two years after Dickens’s death, Sydney died at sea at the age of twenty-five. He left what money he had to his mother in his will. Writing to her sister Helen in 1858, the year of her banishment, Catherine noted that Sydney, aged eleven, “was full of solicitude and anxiety about me, always asking what I should do when they were gone, and if I would not be very dull and lonely without them.”
Plorn’s fortunes rose and fell in Australia. As with all his siblings, he benefited from his father’s will, but he was not a good businessman. He borrowed money from other members of the family as he became interested in politics. He was elected to the lower assembly of the New South Wales parliament in Sydney. After one term, however, he lost his seat, and while he found work, he also devoted himself to drinking and gambling. He died in 1902 at the age of forty-nine.
It would be easy then, arising from Gottlieb’s work at filling in the details of each one of these Dickens children, to make generalizations about the offspring of famous men, or to ponder on the lure of the colonies for young Englishmen of a certain class and of uncertain abilities. The fate of the Dickens children as outlined here allows us to imagine with greater richness the lives of so many others whose names merely survive on gravestones, or census forms, or on lists of members of the army and navy. They also help us to read the novels of the period, as indeed the Australian adventures of Alfred and Plorn help us to appreciate the novels of writers such as Peter Carey and David Malouf.
The career of Sir Henry Dickens, sixth son of the novelist, however, charted with care by Gottlieb, makes any efforts to generalize impossible. He had some of his father’s ambition and charm and none of his male siblings’ fecklessness. Like his sister Mamie, Henry wrote a book of fond recollections of his father.
Having convinced Dickens to send him to Cambridge, Henry became a lawyer and had a successful career. Of his father he later wrote: “If I was asked, when all is said and done, what is my most abiding memory of him, I should say, beyond all question, it was of his lovable and great-hearted nature.” In later years as a judge, when he was sentencing “a very old hand,” he was interrupted by the accused who said, as must have been said to all of these children of Charles Dickens throughout their lives, “You ain’t a patch on your father.” Henry responded with good humor: “I quite agree with you,” and then, having found out that the man had read his father’s work during a previous sojourn behind bars, sentenced the man to eighteen months in prison where the prisoner, he said, could resume his studies of the works of Charles Dickens.
Henry was, of all of them, the most determined and the most successful. He is the one who stops us finding an easy pattern in this story of these men and women who did not match up to their father’s genius and were generally mauled by it. Henry died in 1933 at the age of eighty-four. In 1898 his sister Kate wrote to Bernard Shaw: “Out of our large family of nine children, there was only one who seemed to me to be really quite sane. That was Henry, my lawyer brother, and I have wondered for years whether his sanity is to last through his life!” As Robert Gottlieb concludes, “she needn’t have worried.”