The Soviet group of Amnesty International is finding itself the target of mounting police harassment. One member has been sentenced, and the trial of a second is imminent. At the same time the group continues to operate vigorously, working on the same lines as Amnesty groups in some twenty-five other countries.
Thus a battle of wills is underway. The outcome should help to show how seriously the Soviet authorities are taking “Basket 3” of the recently signed Helsinki agreements. For the work of the twenty-strong Amnesty group does not touch on Soviet internal affairs. It is concerned with assisting three prisoners of conscience, one in capitalist Spain, one in third-world Sri Lanka, and one in communist Yugoslavia. What is unusual, in Soviet conditions, is that a group not backed by the regime should be active in an international humanitarian organization.
The group member already sentenced is Dr. Sergei Kovalyov, an eminent research biologist and close friend of Andrei Sakharov. Kovalyov was arrested in Moscow in December 1974, only three months after Amnesty International had officially recognized the Soviet group. A year later he was condemned to ten years of forced labor and internal exile for his involvement in such samizdat publications as the Chronicle of Current Events. His Amnesty membership did not figure among the charges, but is believed to have been a significant factor in his arrest and sentence.
Throughout his year of detention Kovalyov was allowed no visits from his wife or friends, and the lawyers he wanted to engage were arbitrarily banned by the authorities. He decided, in the circumstances, to be unrepresented and to defend himself.
The trial was held in Vilnius, the capital of Lithuania, on the grounds that one of the charges concerned his alleged circulation of the samizdat publication A Chronicle of the Lithuanian Catholic Church. Some of his Moscow friends were forcibly prevented by police from boarding the train to go to Vilnius, and the score who got there, including Dr. Sakharov, were barred each day from attending. They could only keep vigil outside. Amnesty International’s requests, over several months, to send an observer to the trial were rejected. Dr. Kovalyov was refused permission to call relevant witnesses, including Dr. Sakharov.
Meanwhile, Soviet reports for foreign consumption solemnly intoned each day that the proceedings were open, and that all legal norms were being observed. The domestic media, by contrast, told the Soviet population nothing at all.
Kovalyov’s sentence was, it seems, a calculated Soviet reply to the many representations on his behalf made by Soviet citizens and by statesmen, scientists, and humanitarian organizations in the West.
Now it is the secretary of the Amnesty group, Dr. Andrei Tverdokhlebov, who is due to stand trial. A physicist aged thirty-five, Tverdokhlebov was arrested last April. The charges against him involve his alleged circulation of “deliberate fabrications defaming the Soviet social and political system,” a crime carrying a maximum penalty of three years’ imprisonment. But the investigators have reportedly had difficulty building a case…
This is exclusive content for subscribers only.
Try two months of unlimited access to The New York Review for just $1 a month.
Continue reading this article, and thousands more from our complete 55+ year archive, for the low introductory rate of just $1 a month.